Lausen Logo
Fordham University: 28th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference

Fordham University: 28th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference

Author
Dr. Ursula Feindor-Schmidt, LL.M.
Dr. Ursula Feindor-Schmidt, LL.M. Lawyer, Partner
Specialised Lawyer for Copyright and Media Law View profile

Share blog post via

The 28th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference at Emily C. & John E. Hansen Intellectual Property Institutes will be held online April 8-9, 2021.

Dr. Ursula Feindor-Schmidt, LL.M. (Lausen Rechtsanwälte) will give a presentation on „The Liability of Online Content Sharing Service Providers in EU Jurisdiction and Legislation –The YouTube/Uploaded Case and Article 17 DSM“. This talk gives an overview of what rightsholders have to be prepared for in order to be able to enforce their rights.
See the preliminary program on page 29 for more information.

Friday, April 9, 2021
2:00pm CEST/8:00am EDT

Register for virtual participation here.

We look forward to seeing you!

More posts

LAUSEN has been recommended by Capital as one of Germany’s leading Media and Press Law Firms for 2026

LAUSEN has been recommended by Capital as one of Germany’s leading Media and Press Law Firms for 2026

LAUSEN has been recognized by the business magazine Capital as one of the “Best Law Firms of 2026.” In the latest ranking, our firm is among Germany’s leading law firms in the field of media and press law. We are particularly pleased to be listed as one of only four law firms nationwide in the …

Read more
Section 50(4) of the AI Act: What organisations must label as AI content from August 2026

Section 50(4) of the AI Act: What organisations must label as AI content from August 2026

For those in a hurry: On 8 May 2026, the European Commission presented the draft guidelines on the labelling requirement under Article 50(4) of the AI Act. These guidelines specify, for the first time,  what deployer of AI systems must visibly label as a deepfake or as ‘text in the public interest’ from 2 August …

Read more
CJEU “Pelham II”: What the New Concept of Pastiche Means for Rights Holders

CJEU “Pelham II”: What the New Concept of Pastiche Means for Rights Holders

What did the CJEU decide in ‘Pelham II’? CJEU (Grand Chamber), Judgment of 14 April 2026 – C-590/23 Almost thirty years after the release of the track ‘Nur mir’, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment on 14 April 2026 in Case C-590/23, defining the contours of the pastiche exception …

Read more