“AI & Copyright” Panel at the 30th Fordham Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference New York

“AI & Copyright” Panel at the 30th Fordham Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference New York

Author
Dr. Ursula Feindor-Schmidt, LL.M.
Dr. Ursula Feindor-Schmidt, LL.M. Lawyer, Partner
Specialised Lawyer for Copyright and Media Law
View profile

Share blog post via

Dr. Ursula Feindor-Schmidt, LL.M. (Lausen Rechtsanwälte) will be participating in the panel on “Artificial Intelligence” at this conference. The panelists will be discussing various aspects of AI, copyright as well as text and data mining under US and EU law.

Friday, April 14, 2023
5:20 PM CEST/ 11:20 AM EDT (70 minutes)

For more information, please see the program on page 33.

This year, the 30th Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference of the Emily C. & John E. Hansen Intellectual Property Institute will be held April 13-14, 2023 at Fordham Law School, New York.

Register for participation here.

We look forward to seeing you!

More posts

LAUSEN has been recommended by Capital as one of Germany’s leading Media and Press Law Firms for 2026

LAUSEN has been recommended by Capital as one of Germany’s leading Media and Press Law Firms for 2026

LAUSEN has been recognized by the business magazine Capital as one of the “Best Law Firms of 2026.” In the latest ranking, our firm is among Germany’s leading law firms in the field of media and press law. We are particularly pleased to be listed as one of only four law firms nationwide in the …

Read more
Section 50(4) of the AI Act: What organisations must label as AI content from August 2026

Section 50(4) of the AI Act: What organisations must label as AI content from August 2026

For those in a hurry: On 8 May 2026, the European Commission presented the draft guidelines on the labelling requirement under Article 50(4) of the AI Act. These guidelines specify, for the first time,  what deployer of AI systems must visibly label as a deepfake or as ‘text in the public interest’ from 2 August …

Read more
CJEU “Pelham II”: What the New Concept of Pastiche Means for Rights Holders

CJEU “Pelham II”: What the New Concept of Pastiche Means for Rights Holders

What did the CJEU decide in ‘Pelham II’? CJEU (Grand Chamber), Judgment of 14 April 2026 – C-590/23 Almost thirty years after the release of the track ‘Nur mir’, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment on 14 April 2026 in Case C-590/23, defining the contours of the pastiche exception …

Read more