The use of artificial intelligence in the creative sector

The use of artificial intelligence in the creative sector

Author
Dr. Ursula Feindor-Schmidt, LL.M.
Dr. Ursula Feindor-Schmidt, LL.M. Lawyer, Partner
Specialised Lawyer for Copyright and Media Law
View profile

Share blog post via

The use of image and text generators in the creative sector has increased sharply with the applications from OpenAi and other providers that are available to everyone. Many companies with creative employees are now asking themselves the question: Can the work results of these AI generators be used without hesitation for their own publications? What needs to be considered? What are the risks and implications of using those AI generated works?

Since mid-2022, not a day goes by without hearing about new applications that deliver very respectable results via artificial intelligence generation. These applications can greatly facilitate the daily work of many creative people who produce a wide variety of text, image or sound every day.

No copyright protection for AI-generated works

However, companies should be aware of the implications of the use of these applications by their employees. On the one hand, this concerns the work product created by the application. Since only so-called “personal intellectual creations” are protected (at least) according to German copyright law under Section 2 UrhG (Copyright Act), and “personal” is only what a human being creates, AI-generated works do not receive the same exclusive protection under the current legal situation. This can cause problems for advertising agencies, for example, when clients discover that competitors are using the same or very similar images. Publishers, too, would not be able to rely on the fact that the cover image of a book can only be used by them. Free riders thus have an easy game.

AI as a tool

On the other hand, if software is only used as a tool by a human which controls the system, protection might be possible, depending on the characteristics of the system. In connection with AI generated works, the text input (also known by “prompt”) and a selection from among several AI-generated images will probably not be sufficient to lead to a protection. However, if AI-generated works are used only as a basis and are extensively and creatively revised by a human being, this revised version may give rise to its own copyright protection and possibly to co-authorship.

AI is not necessarily intelligent

Caution is necessary when an AI writes informational text. The contents of these texts do not necessarily correspond to the truth and facts. Chatbots like ChatGPT calculate certain probabilities for possible (and usually very plausible sounding) wordings. But not every application verifies the truthfulness of the communicated facts. Artificial intelligence is therefore not necessarily intelligent. Texts should therefore always be checked for correctness and up-to-dateness by a human. Responsibility initially falls on the person who publishes the AI-generated work product and in many cases cannot be passed on to the operators of the AI systems either, as they often seek to exclude any responsibility by means of corresponding general terms and conditions.

Attention with prompts

When using AI applications, particular attention should also be paid to the fact that the input of text or images may itself constitutes a copyright infringement. If protected works are used in a prompt, this might constitute unlawful reproduction and adaptation if the rights for such use have not been cleared. In addition, an AI generated work result may be dangerously close to a protected work, for example, if the prompt specifies the style and a particular motif of an artist. In this case, the result may be seen as a derivative and its publication could lead to a copyright infringement.

AI strategy

Companies are therefore recommended to establish AI guidelines for the handling and use of AI applications, which review and select the applications used with regard to their terms and conditions and provide a legal framework for prompts that seeks a minimization of risk.
In addition, documentation is advised when using AI, but above all active management of the newly created opportunities.

 

This article was published in the SMART Legal Guide on March 21, 2023 in the daily newspaper “Die Welt”. To be found here, as well as in the supplement on page 13.

More posts

Reeperbahnfestival – Panel “The State of the AI Dilemma – Protection vs. Music Licensing”

Reeperbahnfestival – Panel “The State of the AI Dilemma – Protection vs. Music Licensing”

Marco Erler, Specialised Lawyer for Copyright und Media at LAUSEN, will discuss one of the music industry’s most pressing issues on this panel at the Reeperbahn Festival: How do we deal with the use of music in the context of AI? Friday, September 19, 2025 13:30 – 14:30 East Hotel / Amber / HH In …

Read more
Reeperbahn Festival: The Legal Update 2025 – What the music industry needs to know now

Reeperbahn Festival: The Legal Update 2025 – What the music industry needs to know now

At the Legal Update 2025, Dr. Kerstin Bäcker, Specialist Lawyer for Copyright and Media Law at LAUSEN, will provide an overview of the latest relevant legal developments with a focus on AI and its impact. Thursday, September 18, 2025, 10:30 – 11:30 a.m. East Hotel / Ginger / HH The focus will be on: ▶️ …

Read more
Mandatory gender information in online store not legal

Mandatory gender information in online store not legal

In the online purchasing process, it is common to ask for gender in addition to name and shipping address. But why is this the case? After all, a person can only be identified by their name. On January 9, 2025 (case number C-394/23), the European Court of Justice ruled that it is no longer mandatory …

Read more